Stryker (SYK) looks to be finishing its 6 month consolidation, and looks to be ready to break out again, if the stock can move above $72 on volume over the near future.
Technically, SYK touched $70 per share in late April, right around the date of its first quarter '07 earnings report and then touched $70 again on August 15th. We were trying to accumulate the stock under $60 but during this market correction SYK never traded below $63 and then for only a brief period of time.
Stryker is an exceptional company: a leader in orthopaedic surgical products and hospital beds, SYK has a compounded annual earnings growth rate of 25% for the last 30 years, with a pristine balance sheet, and very healthy cash flow. While the stock has been stuck in a trading range for the past 6 months it only recently broke out of a 2.5 year consolidation which saw SYK trade between $55 at the highs and the low $40's near the bottom between July '04 and late 2006. Thus even with the breakout above $57 in late '06, the stock hasn't acted like the typical growth stock such as an AAPL or RIMM.
Part of the problem could be that SYK sports the "large-cap growth" moniker, which is an asset class that continues to be out of favor these days, despite the litany of guru's and prognosticators on CNBC telling viewers how attractive the large-cap sector, and large-cap growth in particular, remains. Another reason for the underperformance is that healthcare despite its supposedly favorable demographics, is a sector of the S&P 500 that has underperformed since the March, 2003 bottom. Thus not only is SYK in an unfavorable sector, it is also part of an out-of-favor asset class. (Healthcare - as a sector - has returned just 5% and 6% respectively the last two years within the S&P 500, well short of 2006's 15% return for the S&P 500.)
Fundamentally, SYK continues to grow earnings between 15% - 20% with organic growth between 14% - 16%. While pricing has been challenging the last few years contributing just 1% - 2% to orginic growth, volume continues to grow at mid-teens rates and is expected to continue at that rate for the foreseeable future.
Of the major orthopaedic device makers, i.e. Zimmer, Stryker, Smith & Nephew and Biomet (Biomet has since gone private), Stryker in our eyes continues to be the best of the group. While ZMH sports a higher operating margin than SYK, SYK has a better Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and a higher return on equity (ROE). In addition, the recent Justice Department investigation which has cast a poor light on the consulting arrangments between the device makers and doctor's, leaves SYK in a somewhat better position according to our industry contacts, since SYK didn't abuse these relationships to the extent others did.
Finally, as a portfolio manager, it is always about the cash flow and free-cash-flow generation: currently over the last three years SYK has had a free-cash-flow yield of between 7% - 14% which is pretty extraordinary. Currently SYK's 4q trailing free-cash flow as of June 30 '07 was $826 ml on $5.7 bl in 4q trailing revenues for a 14% "yield" on SYK.
Rumor has it SYK is going to be in the market for an acquisition, and they could likely afford to pay cash for it given the cash generation.
To conclude, SYK a wonderful company in an out-of-favor sector and asset class. I'd love to buy it under $60 but watch for the breakout over $71 - $72 to confirm the next move higher. A large acquisition would cause the stock to come down no doubt, but it would present another buying opportunity for sure.
We'll try and get a chart posted to on SYK shortly.
position in SYK, AAPL, etc.
Thursday, September 13, 2007
Monday, September 10, 2007
Goldman Sachs and the Fed
With the 10-year Treasury trading at 4.29% this morning, and the fed funds rate at 5.25% the Treasury yield curve is telling us that the Fed, Chairman Bernanke, and the FOMC is WAY (!) behind the curve in terms of reacting to economic data.
However before you panic and conclude economic Armageddon is just around the corner, this is the modus operandi of the Fed, if you study historical monetary policy changes: Chairman Greenspan didn't move until January 2001, well after the economy had turned down and the Nasdaq bubble burst, and even back in 1990 - 1991 around the time of the first Gulf War, Chairman Greenspan waited unto employment caved (and caved badly) before cutting the short-term rate.
The Fed waits until the data looks dire, and then they cut aggressively.
Goldman Sachs trading action is much improved: Goldman will report earnings next week for the quarter ended August 31, and the stock hasn't made a new low since August 16th. GS's trading action is much better than Lehman or Bear Stearns right now.
Goldman's trading action is telling us that - relative to the other white-shoe firms - their quarter should be less painful, and that the Fed will likely cut rates aggressively over the next few months.
Goldman is the bellwether of the investment banking firms: it's trading action of late is definite positive and we are edging back into the stock after selling our last bit at $204.
position in GS, LEH, index funds, Treasury bond funds, etc. etc.
However before you panic and conclude economic Armageddon is just around the corner, this is the modus operandi of the Fed, if you study historical monetary policy changes: Chairman Greenspan didn't move until January 2001, well after the economy had turned down and the Nasdaq bubble burst, and even back in 1990 - 1991 around the time of the first Gulf War, Chairman Greenspan waited unto employment caved (and caved badly) before cutting the short-term rate.
The Fed waits until the data looks dire, and then they cut aggressively.
Goldman Sachs trading action is much improved: Goldman will report earnings next week for the quarter ended August 31, and the stock hasn't made a new low since August 16th. GS's trading action is much better than Lehman or Bear Stearns right now.
Goldman's trading action is telling us that - relative to the other white-shoe firms - their quarter should be less painful, and that the Fed will likely cut rates aggressively over the next few months.
Goldman is the bellwether of the investment banking firms: it's trading action of late is definite positive and we are edging back into the stock after selling our last bit at $204.
position in GS, LEH, index funds, Treasury bond funds, etc. etc.
Friday, September 7, 2007
Watching the equity market leadership groups
Each bull market has its own singular leadership stocks or sectors: in the 1980's and 1990's it was technology, financial services and healthcare for sure, particularly large-cap pharma within healthcare during the 1980's and 1990's, but since March of 2000, or rather since March, 2003, the energy, basic materials, telecom and utility sectors have been the market leadership groups, and of those 4 groups, energy, basic materials and utilities have led the way.
With this morning's weak August jobs report of 4,000 jobs being lost by the economy, and the sharp downward revisions to job growth in June and July, it is very clear that we will get a set of fed funds rate reductions as Chairman Bernanke and the Fed will prevent the economy from sinking deeper into a recession.
The market keys for us will be how the former leadership groups act: of the above-mentioned 4 groups, energy continues to look the best technically as the XLE (energy sector ETF), and XOM have consolidated 2007 gains and look to be on the verge of breaking out again, if the price of a barrel of crude oil can move above $78. As a percentage of the S&P 500, energy's earnings weight is 14% of the S&P 500, while the sector's price weight is about 10%.
Utilities, telecom and basic materials each represent about 3% - 4% of the S&P 500 by earnings weight and market cap, and of the 3 groups, basic materials looks to be in the best shape, since precious metals are about half the weighting within the sector, and gold has broken out above $700 on the prospects for easier Fed monetary policy.
Utility action will be contingent on what happens with the TXU deal: I do think a lot of these private equity deals will get done as we move into the fall '07 since an easier Fed will loosen credit spreads and give us a chance to have a normally-shaped yield curve, both of which will restore some stability and sanity to credit and fixed-income markets.
To conclude, watch the market leadership groups for changes therein: the laggards of the last three years have been technology, financials, and consumer staples (the mainstay's of consumer staples being housing and auto's, not exactly two growth groups), and these three sectors comprise about 50% of the S&P 500 by earnings weight and market cap.
Thus, the sector leadership within the S&P 500 is coming from the smallest sectors within the index, which isn't a bad thing, it is just unusual. Financials represent almost 27% of the S&P 500 by earnings weight in and of itself. An easier Fed with a yield curve that is normally sloped can be earnings nirvana for the financial sector.
position in most/all sectors mentioned above
With this morning's weak August jobs report of 4,000 jobs being lost by the economy, and the sharp downward revisions to job growth in June and July, it is very clear that we will get a set of fed funds rate reductions as Chairman Bernanke and the Fed will prevent the economy from sinking deeper into a recession.
The market keys for us will be how the former leadership groups act: of the above-mentioned 4 groups, energy continues to look the best technically as the XLE (energy sector ETF), and XOM have consolidated 2007 gains and look to be on the verge of breaking out again, if the price of a barrel of crude oil can move above $78. As a percentage of the S&P 500, energy's earnings weight is 14% of the S&P 500, while the sector's price weight is about 10%.
Utilities, telecom and basic materials each represent about 3% - 4% of the S&P 500 by earnings weight and market cap, and of the 3 groups, basic materials looks to be in the best shape, since precious metals are about half the weighting within the sector, and gold has broken out above $700 on the prospects for easier Fed monetary policy.
Utility action will be contingent on what happens with the TXU deal: I do think a lot of these private equity deals will get done as we move into the fall '07 since an easier Fed will loosen credit spreads and give us a chance to have a normally-shaped yield curve, both of which will restore some stability and sanity to credit and fixed-income markets.
To conclude, watch the market leadership groups for changes therein: the laggards of the last three years have been technology, financials, and consumer staples (the mainstay's of consumer staples being housing and auto's, not exactly two growth groups), and these three sectors comprise about 50% of the S&P 500 by earnings weight and market cap.
Thus, the sector leadership within the S&P 500 is coming from the smallest sectors within the index, which isn't a bad thing, it is just unusual. Financials represent almost 27% of the S&P 500 by earnings weight in and of itself. An easier Fed with a yield curve that is normally sloped can be earnings nirvana for the financial sector.
position in most/all sectors mentioned above
Thursday, August 23, 2007
Fixed-income strategy: two interesting closed-end funds
With the discount rate reduction announced late last week, we are slowly changing our fixed-income or balanced accounts to take more interest rate and credit risk, after keeping all of our fixed-income money in a higher-yielding Schwab money market the last year. Thanks to the inverted yield curve, there was little incentive to take either interest rate or credit risk, a strategy that has paid off handsomely the last eight weeks.
However, with the discount rate announcement, the unlocking of the credit spreads and the expected new liquidity from coming fed funds rate reductions should have a beneficial effect on credit instruments, so here are two closed-end funds we have been buying for client accounts:
---------
The DUC or the Duff & Phelp's Utility and Corporate Bond Trust is a closed-end utility and corporate bond fund that is currently trading at a 7% discount to NAV (as of this posting) and is yielding north of 7%. The chart is WAY interesting (to paraphrase a West Coast Valley girl): on a monthly chart (attached and compliments of http://www.wordencom/) DUC has historically bottomed with the end of Fed tightenings: in November and December, 1994 DUC bottomed at $10.25 and $10.50 per share which marked the end of the 1994 round of tightenings by then-Chairman Alan Greenspan, and then again in March and June of 2000, DUC bottomed at $10.69 and $10.56, and on both occasions, DUC - over the next two years - traded from these fed-induced lows to a high of $15 per share as the Fed reversed course and provided for an easier monetary policy. (See attached monthly chart above, and note the low coincident with Fed tightening cycles.)
Fundamentally, DUC's holdings consist of a 10 3/8th's Treasury maturing on 11/15/12 (essentially a 5-year Treasury) which is 8% of the closed-end fund, with 33% of the corporate's being utility credits and 28% financial credits. From a rating perspective, 18% of the funds credits are AAA/AA, and 48% are BBB+ or below. (Statistics compliments of etfconnect.com).
The monthly distribution is $0.065 per share (six and a half cents).
Our target price is between $14 - $15 per share, which given historical technical patterns, DUC should make easily. The DUC fund is WAY (!) oversold on the daily, weekly and monthly charts, so the technicals and fundamentals are lining up nicely.
---------------
The second interesting closed-end fund we have been buying is the JRO, or John Nuveen closed-end leveraged loan fund. The JRO is trading between a 3% - 4% discount to NAV, and its current distribution rate is close to 10% (again, the current stats courtesy of ETFconnect.com).
20% of JRO's credits are from the media sector, with the 2nd largest holding at 3% of the fund being a Chicago Tribune credit, which saw its acquisition by Sam Zell close yesterday.
Consider this closed-end ETF to be a spicier credit play on the CLO/CDO, leveraged-loan lock-up frenzy, thus be more careful with JRO and buy in over time as we are doing. ETFconnect.com did NOT provide a ratings distribution on JRO as of this posting so assume that all credits are below investment grade.
Last week, just prior to the Fed's discount rate announcement, JRO fell below the late 2005 lows of $12.15 - $12.17 per share and gapped down to as low as $10.74 on the illiquidity issues surrounding high yield paper. The fund has subsequently bounced and will benefit handsomely from the slow unlocking and re-pricing of credit spreads over the next 6 months.
Our price target is alos $14 - $15 per share. The JRO fund is now very oversold on a weekly chart and can bounce nicely with further fed rate cuts in our opinion.
-------
To conclude, I think these closed-end funds provide a diversified vehicle to add credit risk to client accounts and yet remain diversified and liquid. Right now, the two aforementioned funds are a couple of our favorites, but we're always looking for more.
We'll try and keep readers updated on our thoughts on these funds but we may sell out entirely or even add more to the positions without updating the blog. However, we'll do our level best to keep readers updated. I think these two funds are better longer-term plays on what we hope will be improving liquidity and credit spreads in the corporate bond markets.
position in DUC, JRO
Trinity Asset Management, Inc. by:
Brian Gilmartin, CFA
Portfolio manager
Tuesday, August 14, 2007
Trinity's fixed-income strategy
With Walmart's (WMT) earnings this morning, it is clear that the consumer is slowing. (We owe readers an apology: I thought WMT would report earnings last Thursday, August 8th, but instead WMT reported this morning.)
With WMT lowering guidance thanks to a weakened consumer, and WMT accounting for 10% of all retail sales, and consumption 2/3rd's of GDP, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that GDP could suffer in coming months.
With a Fed that could start cutting rates before we see the end of August or September, here is how we are positioning our fixed-income accounts regarding interest rate risk, and credit risk:
If and when the Fed cuts rates, I think the yield curve will in fact steepen, and I would expect the 10-year to trade above 5% and begin returning to more normal slope. Ex fed funds, the 2 - 10 year spread is now back to a positive +35 bp's thus the steepening is beginning already.
We are positioning muni portfolios in the 5 - 7 year maturity range (non-callable), in high quality insured or AA notes, with no credit risk being taken. I think the 5-7 year maturities will outperform in an environment where the Fed is friendlier and where we are moving from an inverted to a normally-sloped curve. The 2-year Treasury is currently yielding 4.44%, thus it has discounted three Fed easings already, which is why we are positioning within 5 - 7 year maturity. We would buy 10-year paper if we get over 5.25%.
In terms of credit risk, I think it is is still too early as credit spreads could continue to widen through September - October, '07. Corporate high yield is getting more interesting, but we have not put any money back into high yield (after selling all of our exposure in early 2005).
All of our taxable bond accounts have been 100% money market the last two years, which didn't look so hot when high yield was trading at +150 Treasuries, but it looks much better now.
Given the currency risk, we have never been international fixed-income investors, preferring to take interest rate and credit risk, and leaving currency risk for others.
I think over the next year we will see some great opportunities to put money to work in high yield, corporate high grade,mortgage-backed (MBS) and asset-backed (ABS), but now is not yet the time.
position in WMT
With WMT lowering guidance thanks to a weakened consumer, and WMT accounting for 10% of all retail sales, and consumption 2/3rd's of GDP, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that GDP could suffer in coming months.
With a Fed that could start cutting rates before we see the end of August or September, here is how we are positioning our fixed-income accounts regarding interest rate risk, and credit risk:
If and when the Fed cuts rates, I think the yield curve will in fact steepen, and I would expect the 10-year to trade above 5% and begin returning to more normal slope. Ex fed funds, the 2 - 10 year spread is now back to a positive +35 bp's thus the steepening is beginning already.
We are positioning muni portfolios in the 5 - 7 year maturity range (non-callable), in high quality insured or AA notes, with no credit risk being taken. I think the 5-7 year maturities will outperform in an environment where the Fed is friendlier and where we are moving from an inverted to a normally-sloped curve. The 2-year Treasury is currently yielding 4.44%, thus it has discounted three Fed easings already, which is why we are positioning within 5 - 7 year maturity. We would buy 10-year paper if we get over 5.25%.
In terms of credit risk, I think it is is still too early as credit spreads could continue to widen through September - October, '07. Corporate high yield is getting more interesting, but we have not put any money back into high yield (after selling all of our exposure in early 2005).
All of our taxable bond accounts have been 100% money market the last two years, which didn't look so hot when high yield was trading at +150 Treasuries, but it looks much better now.
Given the currency risk, we have never been international fixed-income investors, preferring to take interest rate and credit risk, and leaving currency risk for others.
I think over the next year we will see some great opportunities to put money to work in high yield, corporate high grade,mortgage-backed (MBS) and asset-backed (ABS), but now is not yet the time.
position in WMT
Monday, August 6, 2007
Walmart reports earnings this week - critical read of consumer
WalMart (WMT) reports earnings later this week, and unlike Exxon-Mobil which some people think is the key stock for this market given that XOM is the largest market cap name in the best performing sector of the past three years, I think WalMart is the key "tell" for this market, given its importance in deciphering the behavior of the US consumer.
Most people failed to notice that on the day that the Dow closed above 14,000 and the S&P 500 closed at 1,555, was the same day that WalMart announced June comp's that were 2% - 3% versus the less than 1% expected, which was a pleasant upside surprise that Thursday morning, July 14th (I think that was the date of the most recent highs.)
The point is that consumption is 2/3rd's of GDP, and WalMart accounts for 10% of all retail sales in a year, thus if mortgage worries and higher gas prices and consumer confidence were to impair the consumer to any great degree than the equity market is currently discounting, it would likely show up in WalMart's revenues, earnings, comp's and guidance.
My own personal opinion is that WalMart is a cheap stock: trading at 9(x) earnings for a mid-single-digit earnings grower, and just .5(x) 4q trailing sales (yes, WMT is trading at a market cap that is close to half of its 4q trailing sales) and just 11(x) cash flow from operations, with a AA-credit rating indicative of a solid balance sheet , I consider the stock to be a safe haven not only within retail but within the large-cap sector in general.
WMT as an investment is now the antithesis of what it was in the late 1990's: it is unloved, with few advocates on Wall Street pushing the stock, and it gets bashed with unrelenting frequency (and rather unjustifiably in my opinion) when the press needs a capitalist fall-guy to pick on for a story.
After reaching a high of $70 per share in late 1999, early 2000, the stock has traded as low as $40, but it has essentially been trapped in a 7 - 8 year trading range. Although we are currently long the stock and consider WMT a core position in our client portfolios, I am waiting for the stock to take out $50 per share on heavy volume, before we add to the name.
Current analyst consensus for this coming week's earnings report is $0.77 per share and $92.7 bl in revenues for year-over-year growth of 7% and 8.5% respectively, thus coming into this week's results, expectations are tempered.
One interesting aspect of WMT's fundamental story is the growing importance of the international operations to the core business: once just a single-digit percentage of revenues and operating income, WMT International is now higher than 20% of total revenues while international operating income as a percentage of WMT's total operating income gravitates above and below the 20% figure. (Frankly given that investors and strategists are falling all over themselves to have international in their portfolios, I thought WMT would have been afforded a higher multiple for its international growth, which has averaged between 10% and 30% the last five years (i.e. WMT's international operating income has varied between those two figures since the early 2000's.)
To conclude, WMT is a company that generates $350 bl in annual revenues, which is a truly remarkable figure when you come to think of it, and they have achieved this success by having one single mantra: be the low-price retailer to their customers, and they have managed to accomplish this by assembling a coordinating a logistics and distribution network that would put the US Army and National Guard to shame. (Rumor has it that just after Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans, WMT's trucks were the first to penetrate the devastation and get to their stores. Joe Nocera, who writes the main column for the New York Times business section Saturday edition once wrote that WMT could be the single biggest reason inflation remained contained during the 1990's.)
I don't know, nor want to speculate that this week's earnings report will push the stock higher, and above key technical levels, but WalMart will give us some good clues to the state of the US consumer, and how this mortgage crisis is impacting mainstream America.
position in WMT, XOM
Most people failed to notice that on the day that the Dow closed above 14,000 and the S&P 500 closed at 1,555, was the same day that WalMart announced June comp's that were 2% - 3% versus the less than 1% expected, which was a pleasant upside surprise that Thursday morning, July 14th (I think that was the date of the most recent highs.)
The point is that consumption is 2/3rd's of GDP, and WalMart accounts for 10% of all retail sales in a year, thus if mortgage worries and higher gas prices and consumer confidence were to impair the consumer to any great degree than the equity market is currently discounting, it would likely show up in WalMart's revenues, earnings, comp's and guidance.
My own personal opinion is that WalMart is a cheap stock: trading at 9(x) earnings for a mid-single-digit earnings grower, and just .5(x) 4q trailing sales (yes, WMT is trading at a market cap that is close to half of its 4q trailing sales) and just 11(x) cash flow from operations, with a AA-credit rating indicative of a solid balance sheet , I consider the stock to be a safe haven not only within retail but within the large-cap sector in general.
WMT as an investment is now the antithesis of what it was in the late 1990's: it is unloved, with few advocates on Wall Street pushing the stock, and it gets bashed with unrelenting frequency (and rather unjustifiably in my opinion) when the press needs a capitalist fall-guy to pick on for a story.
After reaching a high of $70 per share in late 1999, early 2000, the stock has traded as low as $40, but it has essentially been trapped in a 7 - 8 year trading range. Although we are currently long the stock and consider WMT a core position in our client portfolios, I am waiting for the stock to take out $50 per share on heavy volume, before we add to the name.
Current analyst consensus for this coming week's earnings report is $0.77 per share and $92.7 bl in revenues for year-over-year growth of 7% and 8.5% respectively, thus coming into this week's results, expectations are tempered.
One interesting aspect of WMT's fundamental story is the growing importance of the international operations to the core business: once just a single-digit percentage of revenues and operating income, WMT International is now higher than 20% of total revenues while international operating income as a percentage of WMT's total operating income gravitates above and below the 20% figure. (Frankly given that investors and strategists are falling all over themselves to have international in their portfolios, I thought WMT would have been afforded a higher multiple for its international growth, which has averaged between 10% and 30% the last five years (i.e. WMT's international operating income has varied between those two figures since the early 2000's.)
To conclude, WMT is a company that generates $350 bl in annual revenues, which is a truly remarkable figure when you come to think of it, and they have achieved this success by having one single mantra: be the low-price retailer to their customers, and they have managed to accomplish this by assembling a coordinating a logistics and distribution network that would put the US Army and National Guard to shame. (Rumor has it that just after Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans, WMT's trucks were the first to penetrate the devastation and get to their stores. Joe Nocera, who writes the main column for the New York Times business section Saturday edition once wrote that WMT could be the single biggest reason inflation remained contained during the 1990's.)
I don't know, nor want to speculate that this week's earnings report will push the stock higher, and above key technical levels, but WalMart will give us some good clues to the state of the US consumer, and how this mortgage crisis is impacting mainstream America.
position in WMT, XOM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)